Search for: "White v. The Picture People Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2010, 7:47 am
Jan. 31, 2002)), she was reversed by the 7th Circuit (Te-Ta-Ma Truth Foundation Family of Uri Inc v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:47 am
Jan. 31, 2002)), she was reversed by the 7th Circuit (Te-Ta-Ma Truth Foundation Family of Uri Inc v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
[Post by Venkat] Buckles v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
Checkpoint Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:50 am
I find them targetting [sic] people that are not white, straight, or just simply point out the very strict racist history in this country. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
I encourage you to take a look at these pictures: 1925 and 1935. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:00 am
Urban Outfitters, Inc., issued on April 8. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:57 pm
Take Two Interactive Software, Inc., Lindsay Lohan and “Mob Wives” star Karen Gravano lost a lawsuit in which they claimed that Grand Theft Auto V had misappropriated their images. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
The UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic submitted a brief in an interesting New Jersey trial court case a few weeks ago (Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am
" Grove Fresh Distrib., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
White, 627 F.2d 637, 649 (3d Cir. 1980); Garcia v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:29 am
Inc., 2011 WL 8427612 (C.D. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
” Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:43 pm
In Cine SK8, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
White Consol. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:24 am
In that sense, his case is similar to the White v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
Mahoney v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
Here the quoted cases were White v Samsung, Wendt v Host International and Douglas v Mattel. [read post]
